Last edited by Kijora
Wednesday, May 6, 2020 | History

5 edition of The Nuclear debate found in the catalog.

The Nuclear debate

issues and politics

  • 0 Want to read
  • 22 Currently reading

Published by Royal Institute of International Affairs, Routledge & Kegan Paul in London, London, Boston .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Nuclear disarmament.,
  • Nuclear arms control.,
  • Antinuclear movement.

  • Edition Notes

    Includes bibliographies.

    Statementedited by Phil Williams.
    SeriesChatham House special paper
    ContributionsWilliams, Phil, 1948-
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsJX1974.7 .N813 1984
    The Physical Object
    Paginationv, 81 p. ;
    Number of Pages81
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL2840137M
    ISBN 100710203136
    LC Control Number84001975

    User Review - Flag as inappropriate This book is definitely helpful. It doesn't exactly meet everything, but still was pretty good. I really liked the format of the book and the background, but it would've been better if you included Fukushima in it. Also, it would've been better if you were more straightforward about the pros and cons and also included the effects on domestication/5(2). Description: Over the past fifteen years, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons has been a staple in International Relations courses because of its brevity and crystal-clear explanations. The new edition, An Enduring Debate, continues the important discussion of nuclear proliferation and the dangers of a nuclear-armed world.

    “ Published in , just two years after the catastrophic explosion at Chernobyl, Weart’s Nuclear Fear remains a classic study of the way imagery has dominated the nuclear debate. This book is a slimmed-down and revised version of the earlier page volume. Its publication is well timed. Based on extensive research in government archives and private papers, this book analyzes the secret debate within the Eisenhower administration over the pursuit of a nuclear test-ban agreement. In contrast to much recent scholarship, this study concludes that Eisenhower strongly desired to reach an accord with the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom to cease nuclear .

      Victor D. Cha and David C. Kang’s Nuclear North Korea was first published in amid the outbreak of a lasting crisis over the North Korean nuclear program. It promptly became a landmark of an ongoing debate in academic and policy circles about whether to engage or contain North Korea. Book Description. Making the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party’s nuclear tests in its starting point, this book examines how opinion amongst India’s ‘attentive’ public shifted from supporting nuclear abstinence to accepting — and even feeling a need for — a more assertive policy, by examining the complexities of the debate in India on nuclear policy in the s.


Share this book
You might also like
Tariff index theory

Tariff index theory

art of being a girl.

art of being a girl.

Euromoney Legal Group guide to the worlds leading insurance and reinsurance lawyers.

Euromoney Legal Group guide to the worlds leading insurance and reinsurance lawyers.

A civic century

A civic century

Lectures on magnetoionic theory

Lectures on magnetoionic theory

Realism and idealism in Wilsons peace program

Realism and idealism in Wilsons peace program

New England bean-pot

New England bean-pot

music of Chou Wen-Chung

music of Chou Wen-Chung

Mechanical Component Characteristics and Specifications

Mechanical Component Characteristics and Specifications

Notes on human osteology.

Notes on human osteology.

Intermediate conversational German

Intermediate conversational German

Software engineering handbook

Software engineering handbook

Wage chronology: Lockheed - California Company

Wage chronology: Lockheed - California Company

Children using language

Children using language

The Nuclear debate Download PDF EPUB FB2

In the fourth edition of their seminal text: The Spread of Nuclear Weapons an enduring debate, the two giants of political science exchange rhetorical blows over whether more nuclear weapons are a good or bad thing for the world as a whole/5(6). : The Nuclear Debate: Deterrence and the Lapse of Faith (Lehrman Institute Book) (): Robert W.

Tucker: Books. This annotated bibliography will serve as a starting point for information on the issue of nuclear power.

Arranged for easy use into three sections – Pro-Nuclear, Anti-Nuclear, and Neutral – the book cites over a hundred of the most important books on the subject, offering for each full bibliographic data and a lengthy annotation that is balanced and : Jerry W. Mansfield. Arguing against conventional wisdom, the contributors make a convincing case that domestic variables are far more powerful than external factors in shaping nuclear decision making.

The book explores what drives debates and how decisions are framed, the interplay between domestic dynamics and geopolitical calculations in the discourse, where the center of gravity of debates lies in each country, and what this means for regional cooperation or competition and U.S.

nuclear Format: Hardcover. Contemporary Nuclear Debates is a remarkable The Nuclear debate book to the current deliberation (Dingli Shen, Professor and Deputy Director, The Nuclear debate book for American Studies, Fudan University, China) Contemporary Nuclear Debates succeeds admirably in presenting a wide range of views on traditional nuclear questions recast in the current international environment.3/5(2).

Contemporary Nuclear Debates discusses the key issues surrounding that book is divided into four parts. Part I, "US National Missile Defense: When and How?" presents an overview of the missile defense debate and examines the merits of different deployment systems, such as sea-based, space-based, and boost-phase.

The book contrasts the secrecy and near-silence of the Heath, Wilson and Callaghan governments on nuclear issues in the s with the increasingly vocal case made for the possession of nuclear weapons by the first Thatcher government following a.

Format: Paperback. This book is presented in an academic debate style. Waltz beings with a discussion of why the spread of nuclear weapons is not detremental to world peace.

Sagan counters, after which both comment on the recent spread of nuclear weapons /5(9). Nuclear Energy: the Good, the Bad, and the Debatable Learn more about nuclear technology, its benfits, and its dangers. Classroom Material Written by: Dr. Lana Aref. Editing and Content Development by: Dr.

Lana Aref, and Profs. Patricia J. Culligan, Kenneth R. Czerwinski, and Heidi M. Nepf Massachusetts Institute of Technology. presents an overview of the The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, in the hands of both states and terrorist networks, is considered by many to be the greatest threat to global security today.

Contemporary Nuclear Debates discusses the key issues surrounding that threat. The book is divided into four parts/5(6). Scott Sagan and Kenneth Waltz play out this debate in this book that looks at the nuclear question through organisational and realist perspectives.

If you thought the answer to this debate was obvious, think again - this book will certainly leave you with a lot of questions. Foreword / James Finn --The new nuclear debate: The case for selective options / Robert A. Gessert --Political and ethical considerations / J.

Bryan Hehir --Response to J. Bryan Hehir --Response to Robert A. Gessert. Series Title: Council on Religion and International Affairs.; CRIA special studies: Responsibility: Robert A. Gessert, J. Bryan. Nuclear Energy Debate Volume Editor: Justin Healey.

Print book ISBN: E-book ISBN: Year: $ (includes $ GST). Making the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party’s nuclear tests in its starting point, this book examines how opinion amongst India’s ‘attentive’ public shifted from supporting nuclear abstinence to accepting — and even feeling a need for — a more assertive policy, by examining the complexities of the debate in India on nuclear policy in the by: 6.

The contending theorems and proofs are elaborated beyond (Waltz, ) in "The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A debate renewed" (Sagan and Waltz, ) in the context of proliferation.

Nuclear Debate (foaled ), a recohorse Disambiguation page providing links to topics that could be referred to by the same search term This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Nuclear debate. This shift occurred against a background of rising Cold War tensions and a growing public nuclear debate in the UK.

The book seeks to contextualise and explain this transformation, considering the role of party politics, structures and personalities inside the government, and external influences: notably the role of investigative journalists Author: Daniel Brian Salisbury.

In an intelligent and trenchant debate, the authors look at the implications of a nuclear North Korea for East Asia and U.S. homeland security, rigorously assessing historical and current U.S. policy, and provide a workable framework for constructive policy that should be followed by the United States, Japan, and South Korea if engagement fails to stop North.

Fundamental changes in international relations during toppled the pillars of the security policy paradigm which had characterised the Cold War. That convulsion swept aside the last of many nuclear debates to rend NATO.

Immediately the nuclear problems which had plagued the s were tossed. Making the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party’s nuclear tests in its starting point, this book examines how opinion amongst India’s ‘attentive’ public shifted from supporting nuclear abstinence to accepting — and even feeling a need for — a more assertive policy, by examining the complexities of the debate in India on nuclear.

The nuclear power debate is a long-running controversy about the risks and benefits of using nuclear reactors to generate electricity for civilian purposes.

The debate about nuclear power peaked during the s and s, as more and more reactors were built and came online, and "reached an intensity unprecedented in the history of technology controversies" in some .Abstract. This essay examines the growth of skepticism about the present system of nuclear deterrence.

Tucker resists predicting the ultimate outcome, but he views the nuclear debate of this decade as an important ''lapse of faith'' in deterrence and he doubts there will ever be a full restoration of confidence.The author suggests that the strategic nuclear debate has changed little since the s in spite of radically changing circumstances, because (1) the premises remain untestable, so it is easy to believe or rationalize anything; (2) nuclear weapons are different and their dangers represent an unprecedented discontinuity in human history; and (3.